:crying: and I thought the dog was Bad.............:crying:

I think she might have got some unusual food off the kids...:nono:..... she was so bad we had 2 windows and the door open....

I fell asleep on the settee.... and woke up chewing it.....:yoinks:... hubby had gone for a lie down... and it was getting cold...so he closed the door....

It filled the cabin....

Then he comes out of the bedroom..... gagging.........:crying:... she'd followed him in........:crying:....o

I said what you closed the door for...?...

Him. Well... It was coming in cold..:shrug:..

Me. I'd rather get hypothermia than chew that.......:crying:...

So we were sitting in 9C.., with all the doors and windows open...:nono:... bloody dog......:crying:

I think someone might have fed her pizza.. with garlic on........ while we weren't watching.....
Bloody hell, I think I just woke up the dearest snickering about that one. Tears on cheeks does not cover it.

So far so good with our mutt, the worst night time mischief is when she goes downstairs and rings her door bell to be let out. Rare, but it does happen, usually when she has gorphed back some foul glick that she discovered on a walk. The stuff she eats if she gets half a chance does not bear thinking about. But so far, no gas attacks. You have my condolences. :bighug: :crying:
 
I've done Bayesian modeling, as well as other types of computer modeling, and think I understand its limitations. "Garbage in - garbage out" comes to mind. The end results depend sensitively on the input, and in the specific case of Bayesian approaches, the input is often educated guesswork of general relationships between variables, not strong data about them. The tool can be used with care for exploring sensitivity of modeled systems to particular influences, but pretending that accurate future predictions can be generated is in my opinion optimistic. The modified approach described in the paper seems to intend to improve the Bayesian process by using observations to adjust the Bayesian functions, but predictions based on Bayesian models will still be limited by the underlying weakness of applicable data. The very use of the Bayesian approach is admission that data which would allow more precise modeling approaches are not possible due to lack of good data. They too often in my opinion dress up somewhat educated guesses as something more reliable. Basing important decisions on them is risky.

Bayesian modeling discussions on a stoner forum. Who woulda thunk? :crying:
1712240687190.gif
 
Nor did I......... :pass: ... but.... I have mine trained to sort themselves out....


View attachment 1675270

See them in amongst the self germing nasturtiums......?........:pass:

They prefer me not to touch them.......:watering:... just add watter..........,
Some of the most amazing volunteers I ever saw was when I was a kid. Mom threw out tomatoes out the back door for my hen to eat.
Well, my hen planted and the tomatoes grew................ and grew and grew and grew.

It grew alongside the backside of the house, all the way past my bedroom window, passed the carport and almost to the gate. At the carport it was the beginning of a chain link fence and I trained it to run up it.
It was my 3rd grade story of what did you do this summer. I titled mine "Jack and the Giant Tomato plant!" I took pictures with Moms Kodak 110 all summer long. I had a presentation with a poster board with all the pictures I took!

Surely there are still teachers today that do the same thing. At least I hope there still is! I doubt very seriously if it is as prevalent as when I was a kid, though.

Even though I had been working and helping Grandma in her flower and food garden for several years, it really was that volunteer tomato that got me really interested in gardening. That black sticky gumbo soil was a pain in the ass to work, it sure will grow some vegetables! That soil had such a small margin of workability, the conditions almost had to be perfect to be able to work the soil!

I bet it could grow some absolute killer cannabis, but you would have to add quite a large amount of volcanic pumice to up the aeration, Raised beds and a living cover crop . All to help to be able to manipulate the moisture level and root exploration to a better degree.
 
Some of the most amazing volunteers I ever saw was when I was a kid. Mom threw out tomatoes out the back door for my hen to eat.
Well, my hen planted and the tomatoes grew................ and grew and grew and grew.

It grew alongside the backside of the house, all the way past my bedroom window, passed the carport and almost to the gate. At the carport it was the beginning of a chain link fence and I trained it to run up it.
It was my 3rd grade story of what did you do this summer. I titled mine "Jack and the Giant Tomato plant!" I took pictures with Moms Kodak 110 all summer long. I had a presentation with a poster board with all the pictures I took!

Surely there are still teachers today that do the same thing. At least I hope there still is! I doubt very seriously if it is as prevalent as when I was a kid, though.

Even though I had been working and helping Grandma in her flower and food garden for several years, it really was that volunteer tomato that got me really interested in gardening. That black sticky gumbo soil was a pain in the ass to work, it sure will grow some vegetables! That soil had such a small margin of workability, the conditions almost had to be perfect to be able to work the soil!

I bet it could grow some absolute killer cannabis, but you would have to add quite a large amount of volcanic pumice to up the aeration, Raised beds and a living cover crop . All to help to be able to manipulate the moisture level and root exploration to a better degree.
My wife used to teach 1st grade bilingual (Spanish/English)at a school in our rust-belt neighborhood. One day she asked the kids if they had any pet animals. Some of them could only think of "Cockroaches and rats." In a lesson about family, one little girl volunteered, "Bobbi's dad is my dad now."
 
Back
Top