I thought I would start a thread for Discussion and Documentation of using supplemental lighting.
All manufacturers are included and your input would be appreciated.
My input will be from my HLG UVA supplemental light and Mars Hydro ADLITE series.
I now have two grows under my belt with using the HLG UVA light bar. It is a very powerful light that has a definite effect on the plant .
The first two grows were definitely too much of the light. There was a definite improvement in Trichome production, I think in quality and quantity, but I do think that the plant suffered a bit too much damage in its leaf structure. In the first run where there is just way too much UVA, most of the girls got very very dark purple with Vidamints being practically black in her purpleness. in the following run she was much, much less dark purple.
I think I have the usage down to what I'm going to do in the next Grow. Auto's or photos will be treated the same and UV not started until the third week. It's still on the blue end of the spectrum so it will tend to keep the girl shorter. I think all I'm gonna do once started is 15 minutes a day in mid cycle. The first week of flower It will be increased to 30 minutes mid cycle. And the following week it will be increased to one hour mid cycle and remain there until later in flower. Once reaching mid flower, it will go to two hours mid cycle until chop.
I think that will give the results I'm looking for with minimal plant damage. Naturally, with minimal damage, production should Increase slightly.
For the time being, the Deep Red will be the only Mars supplemental lighting I will be doing. I'm doing that in the 2x4 TENT because I think the Mars Hydro SP 3000 is a little blue heavy in the spectrum. I think my girls tend to be a little shorter in that tent.
Since I mainly grow Indica in that tent, I'm not going to have to worry about some crazy sativa going nuts with some crazy spacing.
And I think for this first run I will just run the Deep Red on the same cycle as the main light. If I see way too much stretching or too large of node spacing I can always back it off or turn it off. now I did get the larger size thinking that one day I will utilize it in my 4x4 tent. That may mean I have to run it at less than full light cycle.
I do think that the infrared bar could be useful And I really think it would be most useful and growing photos with the shorter flowering lighting Schedule. the theory is that you use the infrared 30 minutes before the other light comes on and it helps wake up the plant sooner. And with 30 minutes after the lights go out, it tells the plant to go to sleep.
It only makes sense that if this is true, it will make the plant more productive. The sooner it gets in gear and wakes up, the more photosynthesis occurs. The sooner it gets to sleep, the more all the root system can do its work with the microbes and hormones during the rest period.
Doc Bugsby Says their studies reveal this, so it must be true. How much improvement it makes, is up for question.
But what are we here for? If you're considering Supplemental lighting, you're going to that next level In growing your cannabis!
Justin's video popped up in my feed yesterday and I thought it'd be useful to see what kind of light figures you would get from using all of this. I'm gonna run my own PAR tests once everything is installed and running.
Feel free to post up your experiences! Maybe we can have one place for info on supplemental lighting, I guess until the lighting manufacturers make extremely expensive but completely tunable light fixtures.
I think a lot of the results here are going to be fairly subjective, but I think a good grower that has grown that particular girl before could probably tell fairly easy what has changed whether it's good or bad. I think it will be something interesting and I've already seen positive results from using the UV. Like anything there's a learning curve And there is always room for refinement and improvement. Hey that's why we're here!
All manufacturers are included and your input would be appreciated.
My input will be from my HLG UVA supplemental light and Mars Hydro ADLITE series.
I now have two grows under my belt with using the HLG UVA light bar. It is a very powerful light that has a definite effect on the plant .
The first two grows were definitely too much of the light. There was a definite improvement in Trichome production, I think in quality and quantity, but I do think that the plant suffered a bit too much damage in its leaf structure. In the first run where there is just way too much UVA, most of the girls got very very dark purple with Vidamints being practically black in her purpleness. in the following run she was much, much less dark purple.
I think I have the usage down to what I'm going to do in the next Grow. Auto's or photos will be treated the same and UV not started until the third week. It's still on the blue end of the spectrum so it will tend to keep the girl shorter. I think all I'm gonna do once started is 15 minutes a day in mid cycle. The first week of flower It will be increased to 30 minutes mid cycle. And the following week it will be increased to one hour mid cycle and remain there until later in flower. Once reaching mid flower, it will go to two hours mid cycle until chop.
I think that will give the results I'm looking for with minimal plant damage. Naturally, with minimal damage, production should Increase slightly.
For the time being, the Deep Red will be the only Mars supplemental lighting I will be doing. I'm doing that in the 2x4 TENT because I think the Mars Hydro SP 3000 is a little blue heavy in the spectrum. I think my girls tend to be a little shorter in that tent.
Since I mainly grow Indica in that tent, I'm not going to have to worry about some crazy sativa going nuts with some crazy spacing.
And I think for this first run I will just run the Deep Red on the same cycle as the main light. If I see way too much stretching or too large of node spacing I can always back it off or turn it off. now I did get the larger size thinking that one day I will utilize it in my 4x4 tent. That may mean I have to run it at less than full light cycle.
I do think that the infrared bar could be useful And I really think it would be most useful and growing photos with the shorter flowering lighting Schedule. the theory is that you use the infrared 30 minutes before the other light comes on and it helps wake up the plant sooner. And with 30 minutes after the lights go out, it tells the plant to go to sleep.
It only makes sense that if this is true, it will make the plant more productive. The sooner it gets in gear and wakes up, the more photosynthesis occurs. The sooner it gets to sleep, the more all the root system can do its work with the microbes and hormones during the rest period.
Doc Bugsby Says their studies reveal this, so it must be true. How much improvement it makes, is up for question.
But what are we here for? If you're considering Supplemental lighting, you're going to that next level In growing your cannabis!
Justin's video popped up in my feed yesterday and I thought it'd be useful to see what kind of light figures you would get from using all of this. I'm gonna run my own PAR tests once everything is installed and running.
Feel free to post up your experiences! Maybe we can have one place for info on supplemental lighting, I guess until the lighting manufacturers make extremely expensive but completely tunable light fixtures.
I think a lot of the results here are going to be fairly subjective, but I think a good grower that has grown that particular girl before could probably tell fairly easy what has changed whether it's good or bad. I think it will be something interesting and I've already seen positive results from using the UV. Like anything there's a learning curve And there is always room for refinement and improvement. Hey that's why we're here!