Live Stoner Chat Ancient Aircraft & Spaceship Evidence

Osmanagić, the speaker in that vid, is more of a nut-case author than a archaeologist btw :smoke:
 
Last edited:
must all be bollox then !!:booya:& the mainstream historians have it spot on :crying:
Universe Explorers


There are thousands of ancient pyramids, megalithic structures & artifacts from numerous distant places on the planet that have a lot in common, showing much evidence that challenges the current mainstream teachings of history.

Video: Michael Cremo - The Hidden History Of The Human Race (Full TV Interview)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pe_ndVyU6kU&list=UUQrnNd3cJ_aw8ZyzOtvwmLA&index=2

http://www.youtube.com/user/UniverseExplorersTV
https://www.facebook.com/Universe.Explorers


 
& this dude must just be another nutter :wiz:
Universe Explorers


British biologist Dr. Rupert Sheldrake, one of the world's most innovative scientists, is the author of more than 80 scientific papers and ten books and is best known for his groundbreaking theory of morphic resonance. In this program they discuss Rupert's latest book "The Science Delusion." He begins with an overview of the ten dogmas of science. According to these dogmas, all of reality is material or physical, the world is an inanimate machine, nature is purposeless, free will is an illusion, notions of higher orders of consciousness and absolute "God" awareness exists only as ideas in human minds, which are themselves nothing but electrochemical processes imprisoned within our skulls. These powerful assumptions, have led science down the wrong path according to Rupert. He explains how originally the scientific field held a kind of Cartesian dualistic view of spirit and matter, which eventually was replaced solely by matter. The scientific view that matter is "dead" and has no soul or spirit is dangerous, argues Sheldrake. Later, they talk about the Large Hadron Collider, the most expensive scientific project in the history of mankind. Rupert explains that the results in the search for the "Higgs field" and the so called "God particle" might very well be influenced by the intention of the scientists performing the experiment, also known as the observer's effect. Lastly, Sheldrake talks about the biotech bubble and shares his opinion on what alternative fields of science he would like to see funded.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTbEhe1s6LM&list=UUQrnNd3cJ_aw8ZyzOtvwmLA&index=1




10 Dogmas of Science
www.youtube.comBritish biologist Dr. Rupert Sheldrake, one of the world's most innovative scientists, is the author of more than 80 scientific papers and ten books and is b...

 
Time flies like an arrow...Fruit flies like a banana

..JFK has just been assassinated and Einstein is yet to be born.

It's all about the here and now, what we consider the present is only the present from our perspective.

Events don't "happen" then cease to exist, "moments" are not illuminated by time in a similar way that frames on a movie film are illuminated by the projector. We see one frame after another frame, but the earlier frames ( and the future frames) exist at the same "time", we just don't see them. Moments , however,are not illuminated then plunged into darkness since that would involve the passing of time and well.. a moment is a moment, it cannot change over time.

All " moments" are lit, and will always be lit, the past is as alive as the present, ( and the future ?)

Relativity..Special and general.. has been proven correct "time" and "time" again. In a nutshell special relativity states that 2 observers moving with respect to each other cannot agree on the timing of separate events. for example if a row of lights one each side of a road are alternatively blue and red and each pair lights up and goes out in sequence, a stationary observer would see blue lights coming on on both sides then red then blue etc, but a moving observer may see blue and red lights coming on in sequence. Each observer is justified in their view of events. To one observer a red light has not yet come on to another it is on and to another it was on and has gone off..all are correct.

This means that someones present is also someone elses past and someone elses future. Past present AND future all exist AT THE SAME "TIME". I have just started writing this post, I have just thought of writing this post and someone else has just replied telling me it's all bolloc*s.
 
Last edited:
Time flies like an arrow...Fruit flies like a banana

..JFK has just been assassinated and Einstein is yet to be born.

It's all about the here and now, what we consider the present is only the present from our perspective.

Events don't "happen" then cease to exist, "moments" are not illuminated by time in a similar way that frames on a movie film are illuminated by the projector. We see one frame after another frame, but the earlier frames ( and the future frames) exist at the same "time", we just don't see them. Moments , however,are not illuminated then plunged into darkness since that would involve the passing of time and well.. a moment is a moment, it cannot change over time.

All " moments" are lit, and will always be lit, the past is as alive as the present, ( and the future ?)

Relativity..Special and general.. has been proven correct "time" and "time" again. In a nutshell special relativity states that 2 observers moving with respect to each other cannot agree on the timing of separate events. for example if a row of lights one each side of a road are alternatively blue and red and each pair lights up and goes out in sequence, a stationary observer would see blue lights coming on on both sides then red then blue etc, but a moving observer may see blue and red lights coming on in sequence. Each observer is justified in their view of events. To one observer a red light has not yet come on to another it is on and to another it was on and has gone off..all are correct.

This means that someones present is also someone elses past and someone elses future. Past present AND future all exist AT THE SAME "TIME". I have just started writing this post, I have just thought of writing this post and someone else has just replied telling me it's all bolloc*s.

Wow, definitely too medicated to touch that one. :thumbs:
 
Ahh but i knew that already, or i think i will know that...
 
40 or so years ago JFK was shot, this is on my past list

Now someone on a planet 40 or so light years away ( and we assume they are not moving relative to us..ignore the expansion of space and the movements of the galaxies), can look at earth with a very very powerful telescope and see JFK being shot but JFK being shot and is not really on his now list, he knows that the info has traveled across 40 light years and is actually in his past list

But if he starts to move away or toward us then things will change, drastically

Shifts in the time slice angle are enhanced when distance are great, i mean in the billions of miles scale, because at such distance even small changes in direction ( velocity) will create large differences in the angles of the time slices. So someone in a galaxy far far away say 10 billion light years away could have me sitting down at my computer on their "now list" they could then jump in a car and travel for a few miles at a fairly modest speed say 10 mph and then "moments" later they could have events that happened 150 years ago on their now lists. Their now lists are totally valid, before the journey i was at my desk now i have not yet been born !!!

If they traveled at 1000 mph, their now list would contain events that happened 15,000 years ago. and if they moved toward earth at 1000 mph then their now list would contain events that WILL HAPPEN 15000 YEARS INTO OUR FUTURE

There are no paradoxes here because though these now lists exist the information that has to travel from here to there still travels at the speed of light, but when in billions of years the light from earth does reach their descendants and say they had moved away at 10 mph then the descendant will have me at my desk then a moment later their now list will have events in London as they were 150 years ago..all on the same now list

So "in reality" the past present and future all exist right "now"
 
"So "in reality" the past present and future all exist right "now""

I guess thats right in a universal reality,but we as humans are consigned to this planet.So our time IS relative to us & we don't have the ability to see it in any other way .... If we could travel very very fast through space, then maybe time does change .But we can't ,so right now our perception of time is relative.

far out man !!View attachment 167674
 
But we ARE traveling very fast through space, we have angular rotational speed, solar orbiting speed, and our sun orbits the galaxy. Our galaxy is also dancing with other galaxies in our cluster and space itself is expanding dragging our glaxy cluster along at a phenomenal rate.

I guess thats right in a universal reality,but we as humans are consigned to this planet.So our time IS relative to us & we don't have the ability to see it in any other way .... If we could travel very very fast through space, then maybe time does change .But we can't ,so right now our perception of time is relative.
We must take the effect of relativity into account every day, all our global positioning satellites have to take into account special relativity otherwise they would be of no use to us
 
Last edited:
Back
Top