Old Reviews GrowMore Nutrients Q&A with TdiBear
- Thread starter A4
- Start date
Magic
Canna Engineer
QUOTE]I use Jumpstart at 5ml a gallon throughout veg and bloom. It's an organic based biological plant stimulator...
I got this writeup: activates plant cell proliferation by utilizing the rhizosphere microorganism pathway-Mineral nutrient supply can strongly affect the root growth morphology, distribution of root system, and rhizosphere microorganisms. It has been known that certain bacteria can stimulate root growth considerably by production of pytohormones. The effects of the unique combination of nutrients in JumpStart stimulate rhizosphere bacteria population, in turn enhancing root growth and improving nutrient acquisition.
It has amino acids I'm told as well...I guess CDFA who registers retail fertilizer products won't allow any other Bvitamin to be listed on the labels sold in CA, yet Jumpstart has B2, B3, B5, & B6 ...I use it as a foliar at 10ml a gallon mixed with seaweed and fulvic...It works great on babies too...I had a friend who's AC's tripped at the electric panel and didn't know for the two days until he went back. Everything had looked hopelessly dead and his partner was adamant about pulling it all and getting new girls to start fresh. He tried the jumpstart at the "revival" dilution rate and used 15ml/gal and two watering's later later they ALL came back to life and thrived. I wish i had before pics, i just have the after shots...I liken it to Rapid Start due to the Alfalfa and it's claim to help the root zone in it as well, the naturally occurring hormones are abundant based on my plants response to just adding that additive to the mix...[/QUOTE]
https://www.autoflower.org/f26/grow-more-jump-start-26890-2.html
Here you go fellas 1st post from our new friend, thats words From TDIBear from my GM JS thread
I got this writeup: activates plant cell proliferation by utilizing the rhizosphere microorganism pathway-Mineral nutrient supply can strongly affect the root growth morphology, distribution of root system, and rhizosphere microorganisms. It has been known that certain bacteria can stimulate root growth considerably by production of pytohormones. The effects of the unique combination of nutrients in JumpStart stimulate rhizosphere bacteria population, in turn enhancing root growth and improving nutrient acquisition.
It has amino acids I'm told as well...I guess CDFA who registers retail fertilizer products won't allow any other Bvitamin to be listed on the labels sold in CA, yet Jumpstart has B2, B3, B5, & B6 ...I use it as a foliar at 10ml a gallon mixed with seaweed and fulvic...It works great on babies too...I had a friend who's AC's tripped at the electric panel and didn't know for the two days until he went back. Everything had looked hopelessly dead and his partner was adamant about pulling it all and getting new girls to start fresh. He tried the jumpstart at the "revival" dilution rate and used 15ml/gal and two watering's later later they ALL came back to life and thrived. I wish i had before pics, i just have the after shots...I liken it to Rapid Start due to the Alfalfa and it's claim to help the root zone in it as well, the naturally occurring hormones are abundant based on my plants response to just adding that additive to the mix...[/QUOTE]
https://www.autoflower.org/f26/grow-more-jump-start-26890-2.html
Here you go fellas 1st post from our new friend, thats words From TDIBear from my GM JS thread
The CA Cancer warning is not on every thing, just thing proven to cause cancer which happens to be a lot of stuff now a days. I don't believe any of the other nutrients I own, have that warning but both the Seagrows do. I'd like to know, why I shouldn't be concerned?
@Tidbear - Can you address this in some fashion? Thanks
@Tidbear - Can you address this in some fashion? Thanks
Ahhh...Remember the old days in CA when 'sweet and low' and 'Equal' had to have a cancer warning; i do. They were part of this Prop 65 warning efforts that Grow More has been bound to for some time.
Well the sweetner companies greased enough wheels to get the state to 'De-list' Saccharin from the chemical list that requires warnings back in 2003, yet since 88' it was on there.
Grow More gets this question a couple times a day and I'm glad that I can hopefully somewhat set the record straight on it. The propositions intention of protecting consumers has been lost due to frivolous lawsuits that corner businesses into placing a warning label on the product (or placed at the business) without any proof from the plaintiff who brings about the lawsuit. The good news is that CA Governor Jerry Brown has just signed into law a modification of the Prop 65 and will FINALLY allow Grow More to remove the warning off of the label. Unfortunately the current stock of labels will be exhausted, and at which point they are reordered for print the warning will be removed.
Prop. 65 lawsuit bill helps businesses - SFGate
Proposition 65 requires businesses to notify Californians about significant amounts of chemicals in the products they purchase, in their homes or workplaces, or that are released into the environment. By providing this information, Proposition 65 enables Californians to make informed decisions about protecting themselves from exposure to these chemicals.
The list contains a wide range of naturally occurring and synthetic chemicals that are known to cause cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm. These chemicals include additives or ingredients in pesticides, common household products, food, drugs, dyes, or solvents. Listed chemicals may also be used in manufacturing and construction, or they may be byproducts of chemical processes, such as motor vehicle exhaust.
Businesses are required to provide a "clear and reasonable" warning before knowingly and intentionally exposing anyone to a listed chemical. This warning can be given by a variety of means, such as by labeling a consumer product, posting signs at the workplace, distributing notices at a rental housing complex, or publishing notices in a newspaper. Once a chemical is listed, businesses have 12 months to comply with warning requirements. If a warning is placed on a product label or posted or distributed at the workplace, a business, or in rental housing, the business issuing the warning is aware or believes that one or more listed chemicals is present. By law, a warning must be given for listed chemicals unless exposure is low enough to pose no significant risk of cancer or is significantly below levels observed to cause birth defects or other reproductive harm. A business has "safe harbor" from Proposition 65 warning requirements or discharge prohibitions if exposure to a chemical occurs at or below these levels. These safe harbor levels consist of No Significant Risk Levels for chemicals listed as causing cancer and Maximum Allowable Dose Levels for chemicals listed as causing birth defects or other reproductive harm. OEHHA has established over 300 safe harbor levels to date and continues to develop more levels for listed chemicals.
We are currently reviewing all of the chemicals that are in the "safeHarbor" zone as levels for the chemicals listed were just updated with the bill signed by Gov. Brown in Oct 2013. After some routine filings the label warnings should be off for good...I know that answer was a little long winded but I figured that it was important to put it out there. For those who say their other nutrients don't say that; most likely it means that these companies haven't been hit with a 'frivolous' lawsuit that has prompted the company to add the warning. Unfortunately, we have and the burden-of-proof for the plaintiff is almost non-existent to bring about a suit and as such has resulted in numerous people trying to take advantage of loopholes in our judicial and legal system....ahhhhhhh ok I'm done for now!@! Hahahaha let me know if there's anything real specific anyone would like to know...
Well the sweetner companies greased enough wheels to get the state to 'De-list' Saccharin from the chemical list that requires warnings back in 2003, yet since 88' it was on there.
Grow More gets this question a couple times a day and I'm glad that I can hopefully somewhat set the record straight on it. The propositions intention of protecting consumers has been lost due to frivolous lawsuits that corner businesses into placing a warning label on the product (or placed at the business) without any proof from the plaintiff who brings about the lawsuit. The good news is that CA Governor Jerry Brown has just signed into law a modification of the Prop 65 and will FINALLY allow Grow More to remove the warning off of the label. Unfortunately the current stock of labels will be exhausted, and at which point they are reordered for print the warning will be removed.
Prop. 65 lawsuit bill helps businesses - SFGate
Proposition 65 requires businesses to notify Californians about significant amounts of chemicals in the products they purchase, in their homes or workplaces, or that are released into the environment. By providing this information, Proposition 65 enables Californians to make informed decisions about protecting themselves from exposure to these chemicals.
The list contains a wide range of naturally occurring and synthetic chemicals that are known to cause cancer or birth defects or other reproductive harm. These chemicals include additives or ingredients in pesticides, common household products, food, drugs, dyes, or solvents. Listed chemicals may also be used in manufacturing and construction, or they may be byproducts of chemical processes, such as motor vehicle exhaust.
Businesses are required to provide a "clear and reasonable" warning before knowingly and intentionally exposing anyone to a listed chemical. This warning can be given by a variety of means, such as by labeling a consumer product, posting signs at the workplace, distributing notices at a rental housing complex, or publishing notices in a newspaper. Once a chemical is listed, businesses have 12 months to comply with warning requirements. If a warning is placed on a product label or posted or distributed at the workplace, a business, or in rental housing, the business issuing the warning is aware or believes that one or more listed chemicals is present. By law, a warning must be given for listed chemicals unless exposure is low enough to pose no significant risk of cancer or is significantly below levels observed to cause birth defects or other reproductive harm. A business has "safe harbor" from Proposition 65 warning requirements or discharge prohibitions if exposure to a chemical occurs at or below these levels. These safe harbor levels consist of No Significant Risk Levels for chemicals listed as causing cancer and Maximum Allowable Dose Levels for chemicals listed as causing birth defects or other reproductive harm. OEHHA has established over 300 safe harbor levels to date and continues to develop more levels for listed chemicals.
We are currently reviewing all of the chemicals that are in the "safeHarbor" zone as levels for the chemicals listed were just updated with the bill signed by Gov. Brown in Oct 2013. After some routine filings the label warnings should be off for good...I know that answer was a little long winded but I figured that it was important to put it out there. For those who say their other nutrients don't say that; most likely it means that these companies haven't been hit with a 'frivolous' lawsuit that has prompted the company to add the warning. Unfortunately, we have and the burden-of-proof for the plaintiff is almost non-existent to bring about a suit and as such has resulted in numerous people trying to take advantage of loopholes in our judicial and legal system....ahhhhhhh ok I'm done for now!@! Hahahaha let me know if there's anything real specific anyone would like to know...
sniper
scope'n the dope
tdibear something else ive never been able to get a clear answer on atleast that i could understand
the medicino avalanche what exactly does it do and what would other products would it be compared to?
only thing i really know about it is its a flower hardener
the medicino avalanche what exactly does it do and what would other products would it be compared to?
only thing i really know about it is its a flower hardener
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
- Messages
- 16,988
- Reputation
- 5,531
- Reaction score
- 54,397
- Points
- 0
- Currently Smoking
- fine-ass '22 harvest!
Ah! -great Q' Sniper,... I hear enough variation in answers that I still don't have a clear one....
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2013
- Messages
- 5,664
- Reputation
- 700
- Reaction score
- 8,093
- Points
- 0
- Website
- www.youtube.com
- Currently Smoking
- STREET
I think what he is say is that..lots of thins have bin know to be cancer causing...Like a well done BBQ ed thick steak..so to protect your company form someone suing you ..you put the label on there just to cover your butt..Like putting up a wet floor cone so you dont get sued if someone slips ECT...I think LOL :smokebuds:but then again all breaks are made with asbestos so going outside causes cancer too lol front doors should come with a cancer warning ..ILL SUE LOL 
So I'm using the Sea Grow 16-16-16 and I've noticed that there's a good amount of sediment that I can't get to dissolve into water.
Shaking, stirring, warm water, sitting for several days while bubbling...and it's still there.
Is this normal?
Shaking, stirring, warm water, sitting for several days while bubbling...and it's still there.
Is this normal?
Similar threads
- Locked
