New Grower Is this a hermit?

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you want to get that picky they are in fact bracts and not a calyx, a common misconception :D: While it's true the single set of flowers at the node develop into full flowers I refer to them as the pre-flowers long after development just based on the spot and to avoid confusion.
 
It's the starting of preflowering,it's a female.Maybe you should check the knew growers thread to refresh your memory.:crying:

If there is but a single flower then it can not by definition be in preflower, it is in fact in the start of flowering, i realise that generalisations are used to describe the flower process, but when flowering is in full swing and has many calyxes being created forming what is refered to as a bud which is a misnomer (as it is not a bud) this is called florescence , my memory does not need refreshing as it is a biological fact of the flowering structure of cannabis. This will be upheld by any good book on cannabis.

In no way do I want to put anyones nose out of place but if you insist I will just cut and paste the biological taxanomy and terminology of the cannabis plant.

as always peace and lets keep it friendly, its what make this forum so special.

Growerz
 
No, but he was.

HowardHughes.jpg



Sorry Yoda, couldn't resist. That just cracked me up.
 
If there is but a single flower then it can not by definition be in preflower, it is in fact in the start of flowering, i realise that generalisations are used to describe the flower process, but when flowering is in full swing and has many calyxes being created forming what is refered to as a bud which is a misnomer (as it is not a bud) this is called florescence , my memory does not need refreshing as it is a biological fact of the flowering structure of cannabis. This will be upheld by any good book on cannabis.

In no way do I want to put anyones nose out of place but if you insist I will just cut and paste the biological taxanomy and terminology of the cannabis plant.

as always peace and lets keep it friendly, its what make this forum so special.

Growerz

You can cut and paste if you want Growerz, but you're still using incorrect terminology yourself. Be careful how nit-picky you want to get. If you feel this strongly about it then you should refer to the "calyx" as a bract, as that is what it is.

No, they are not preflowers at this point. They are mature, but at one point they were the flowers used for sexing when it was just a seedling, which we refer to as pre-flowers. I see this question come up a lot, how people miss the single set of flowers at the node that have been there most of the grow I will never know, but it happens a lot. Over time I've narrowed a wordy explanation down to "those are your pre-flowers all grown up" and it works.
 
Growerz I think you are confusing people. As well as maybe your self. The stipule I believe has nothing to do with sex. And those calyx in the picture are preflowers , they have just matured. They will not form into "florescence". What they do tell us that it will be a female. Simple as that. They are not directly related to how far in flowering but how old the plant is. The bud sights ( I know its a misnomer the bud would actually be the calyx.) form separately. :2cents:
 
I have a plant that on each of the nodes just one balls looking thing with two pistils coming out are there.. What is this? Beginning of foxtailing or hermie?


Jeesus sorry for the title of thread damn autocorrect

View attachment 258839

View attachment 258840

View attachment 258841

Thanks!

KILL IT !

just kidding , please yoda tell me you didnt ask that , its been asked sooooooo many times on this and every other site out there

all you had to do was use the search feature on site and you would have gotten your answer with pics n all , saving yourself this embarassment

since you fancy yourself a breeder ill tell you something that you can do for fun , you can pollinate those suspected "hermits" while the plant is vegging or in flower

gives ya a shot at getting buds as well as seeds

now then , run along and play :High 5:
 
If there is but a single flower then it can not by definition be in preflower, it is in fact in the start of flowering, i realise that generalisations are used to describe the flower process, but when flowering is in full swing and has many calyxes being created forming what is refered to as a bud which is a misnomer (as it is not a bud) this is called florescence , my memory does not need refreshing as it is a biological fact of the flowering structure of cannabis. This will be upheld by any good book on cannabis.

In no way do I want to put anyones nose out of place but if you insist I will just cut and paste the biological taxanomy and terminology of the cannabis plant.

as always peace and lets keep it friendly, its what make this forum so special.

Growerz

you do know they form on a plant in vegative state too right ? its what most look for to see the plant has reached sexual maturity , the plant can remain in veg state for years after if we wish to keep it that way (non auto of course)
 
Pansy????

I'm also confudsed yoda XD

Peace

Ok it's a term from my good friend da Shadow...

Da Shadow said:
You want a strong virile male, to keep the line strong, not a pansy.
What caused the male to hermi? A female may hermi because it wants to make seed and has not been fertilized. A male has no idea if his pollen fell on a viable pistil, (unless he can communicate with the girls, which some research suggests they do) so he did not hermi to ensure the survival of the species like a female might.

Again I would ask �Why has cannabis evolved into a Dioecious species?�`

Cut and pasted from Wiki;

Angiosperms
It is thought that flowering plants evolved from a common hermaphrodite ancestor, and that dioecy evolved from hermaphroditism. Hermaphroditism is very common in flowering plants; over 85% are hermaphroditic, whereas only about 6-7% are dioecious and 5-6% are monoecious.

End cut and paste

It takes a lot of work (evolutionary speaking) to become a Dioecious plant. There must be an advantage to the cannabis species to have invested all that work. So nature (cannabis species) is trying to make it�s self Dioecious and the breeder using hermi plants is trying to do the opposite.

Is the Male Hermi a throw back to when the speices was Monoecious? If so then the breeding program is headed in the wrong direction. I should also note here another rule of breeding. Genes get passed down to offspring without change, unless mutation or some other factor is playing a role. So every cannabis plant is capable of being hermi. It has been that was (basically) forever.

What caused the plant to hermi is a key to the make up of the plant. The more stress needed to hermi the more evolved the plant is, not to say it will not revert back very quickly over several generations of abuse to a hermi strain. Selection is key when breeding and whenever I see a hermi (under good to great conditions) I kill it. Some people have grown my seeds, we all grew the same seed lot, and one person had hermis, others or I did not, (but with the right stress they will hermi even when using a strong virile male and a stress tested female.) So if the person who had the plants hermi used the plants for breeding then the stressors have already turned on the survival switch and for the next several generations the seeds will be prone to hermi under very little stress. (so if that was the male you are using ... gulp) Where as the other people may not have as nice a plant, but achieve better results because that stressor never pulled the trigger on the survival switch. The switch is still there though�.

Da�Shadow

From the urban dictionary....

1. pansy
A sissy, fag, fairy, or one that is generally unmanly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top