New Grower L.E.D, light rail, 2 think different, 2 afghan kush, 1 NL x BIG BUD, fox farm nutes, five gallon buc

[rush87]

Well, let me start off bye saying that I FOUND the PICTURES on the internet . and can only guess as too the nutrients that this person is using and can only guess as too the plants this person is growing, but heres my educated guess at this whole idea,,2 THINK DIERENTS, 2 aghan kush one is about 3 weeks younger than the other, ! NLxBIG BUD, on a light rail with an ILLUMINATOR 180 from PROSOURCE WORLDWIDE, all of these were started on 12-27-2012,,and showed first leaf sets on 1-4-2013 and bye leaf sets it means the first round leafs,,,they were put under a scrog netting of 2x2 inches and the scrog was set only 6 inches away from the top of the soil, have followed the fox farm feeding schedule exactly with only adding on one extra week of each of open sesame and the beastie bloomz and cha ching, using 50/50 mix of fox farm ocean forest and happy from in 5 gallon buckets, two cfl lights for growing have been attached too the l.e.d with nylon ropes so that they move with the l.e.d light,,well heres some pics, it was pruned (undergrowth)on day 49 and has alot of bud sites on each plant except the NLxBIG BUD,,and the first AFGHAN was ACCIDENTILLY TOPPED ALL OF ITS NODES WHEN IT WAS IN VEG (mixed up with pineapple express) but has made many head colas,,ALL is looking good, BUT wondering why it has taken sooo long for the too get this far as compared too other grows,,IS it because of the 5 gallon buckets? any ideas would be great,,AGAIN THIS IS NOT MINE I FOUND THESE PICTURES ON THE INTERNET AND AM JUST TAKING WILD GUESSES AT IT..

 

[rush87]

oh btw the afghan number 1 is in a one gallon container and is the one that got fim topped in veg,,gave alot more budsites though

 

[rush87]

day 52 for autos,,showing great and plentiful budsites

day 52 for autos,,showing great and plentiful budsites

 

[Sir Cunning]

hey rush, they're looking tasty mate. You did well finding such good descriptive pictures on the internet. Because I like thinking out loud, I would hope if the person who uploaded them was concerned with their privacy that they wiped the EXIF data first. Only because it's probably the quickest and easiest way to identify who where and when they were taken. Of course this purely hypothetical, you have no reason to be concerned at all. And if it came down to it, I'm confident various authorities could use other methods to discern information. But it's something people don't generally seem to be aware of and should probably be first port of call.

Those pictures you found look like that person who took them who certainly isn't you had heaps of space in his/her grow room. I would throat-kick a midget on live TV for more space at the moment, don't take it for granted! The person who took those photos could really stretch those babies out under more light I'd think. I also really like the way you tastefully CAPITALIZE TO EMPHASIZE, I might have to start doing it now and again. I'll be back checking this one out, and if I could talk to the person who took those pictures who certainly isn't you, I'd say good luck and happy growing!

 

[rush87]

cool, I believe that the foot print of the light and the amount of stretch is optimal for this setup, definitely needs more light doesnt THAT person, as far as information im sure any authority figures already have this whole site monitored BUT are more interested in so called "terrorist and security issues rather than some grower" besides one must be caught in the commision of a crime,,pictures are not enough"...but does anyone have a theory as too why they had taken so long? could it be the buckets