I'm with a lot of people who commented on that study. Not only could I not see where it shows California lightworks specifically but also they show cost effectiveness by using 3000 hours on a product that has an expected life of over 50,000 hours. So the parameters of the study are false to begin with. But interesting nonetheless.in this study by Utah state University they seem to be "not so good", those california lightworks lights -atleast compared to hps, regarding use in horticulture
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099010