yodabuds;627849The only posticw feature on it that I notice made a huge difference in flowering was the [U said:
uv side lighting[/U] which really did kick up the trich production. :stylez rasta smoke:
Those are just T8 flourescent tubes UVB 10.0. They can (and CFLs & T5s) are sold in pet stores under the brand name ReptiSun.
How long did you run your UVB lights, and at what distance?
I've been playing with a ReptiSun mini CFL UVB 10.0. I felt like I burned a plant running it for a couple hours about 12" away. Fan leaves higher up yellowed and died. I'm getting the feeling a mini CFL at that distance should run about 20 minutes a day. I will take a more cautious, methodical approach on the next plant.
- - - Updated - - -
the least expensive but also seem to have pretty good reviews but looking at the warranty made me a little iffy about it.
I think TopLED is a tremendous value. You get a lot for the money, they have a representative on a public forum who addresses concerns, lots of satisfied customers. I don't think anyone could go wrong with TopLED.
A couple of business practices make me hesitant to support them. (The "don't say anything bad" clause of the warranty. And the way they don't publish their spectrum ratio using the logic that competitors would kill for it -- even though a competitor could use a common spectrometer to discover the info.). I feel like they're a little too much into a manufactured image (stifling honest customer feedback via the warranty "poison pill", and the mystique of an undisclosed color balance *everyone* wants to replicate -- but can't).
But, I'm considering buying one. There's the principles involved which bother me. But, overall I think it's a good light (which doesn't need those questionable practices to promote it).
- - - Updated - - -
Yeah, I feel yah...it sounds more like a defensive response to some a-hole going off on them to me....but just my take.
But, it also signals "we have a lot of gaping a-holes going off on us."
If you have an a-hole going off on you, the last thing you want to do is invoke the a-hole clause of your warranty and tell them you won't do anything to correct their problem. Do you really want to convert a gaping a-hole into a flaming one? (ha!)
It seems so counter productive to put that poison pill in the warranty. Just take care of the customer and you'll have more genuine positive support rather than managing and suppressing negative reports. Just do what's necessary and let people form their opinions.
They have a 10% discount for grow journals too. But, it has "no troublemaker" clauses too, which makes it look like they're manufacturing an image. I agree that I'd prefer not having a hot-head reviewing my lights. But, trying to manage it looks worse (IMO) than just letting the chips fall where they may.