New Grower Lets make a list of Super Auto's

[Muddy]

Don't worry LBH, we're not forgetting about you or your fine strains. I was speaking strictly in the sense that "Super" is Stitch's word. But it has become a generic term, much like Zerox is used to describe all copy machines, even though it is a trademark. In that sense "super" has come to mean any non ruderalis based auto flowering plants, including yours.

were do mine autoflowering strains fit in? lol they are alternative to long flowering photo strains like pure Haze,s and sativa's that us noordic outdoor growers cant grow they get tall too! and they veg and flowering longer than dwarf auto's llike asian haze is done round 95 day's some more!
stitch have call his taller strians super auto's and i think stitch have done it allone (and me with my own work lol)
make taller autoflowers only his strain are not get there autoflowering treat from lowryder but from taller hungary ruderalis (corect me if im wrong bro)
and mine got it from auto AK and breed too pure haze and breed back too haze's selecting taller and taller over years of work

ether way i think all autoflowers that will come on the seedbank market and that get tall (super autoflowers) will be from stitch his super work ore mine autoflowering haze's
some people have just started so called super auto breeding (pure sativa x lowryder) but they all forgeting wat we dith we dith in lots and lots of years and why invent the wheel again ?
No they will take the short cut !and will cross ower strains /work


sorry for bad english guy's

peace LBH

 

[savoy]

Maybe a list of Autos that get particularly tall for autos would be more diverse. I know there's strain reviews a-plenty but its tough to sort through. I'd like to see a directory, like they have in malls sorta, then with that list we could refer to the strain reviews from the list we're interested in. Example, tall autos, stinky autos, low profile, etc. I've been looking for something that stinks and gets tall and is not fruity. The thing is I didn't trust the heights/yield info on seed banks because I assume their info is a bit biased and optimistic. The srain reviews are a bit clunky and almost too informative for a simple search. So I had to pick through journal after journal to get realistic info.

I think what I'm getting at is categorizing the strains, and organizing the strain reviews accordingly. Sorry to get off topic but that happened a while ago on this thread.

 

[Muddy]

That's a good idea Savoy but a huge undertaking from a mod standpoint. It would require an index of all strain reviews, broken down by various categories, with links to the smoke reports, that would need to be updated often. Anyone care to take it on?

 

[dingo]

Besides Mod support for this to become an informative resource, we need to discuss and agree the mandatory fields in each strain posted.
eg:
Name
Breeder
Reviews
Sativa or Indica or Ruderalis %
Effect
Odour while growing
Odour when dry
Taste
Difficulty level
Prefers PH x.x
Seed to Harvest in days
Grows well around which latitudes
etc.
Height

That's a good idea Savoy but a huge undertaking from a mod standpoint. It would require an index of all strain reviews, broken down by various categories, with links to the smoke reports, that would need to be updated often. Anyone care to take it on?

 

[savoy]

I don't doubt it would be a pain for the mods to re organize backwards. Maybe start a thread from scratch for each category and we could let people list strains they've grown in the one that applies. And we could sorta take an average from the number of times a strain pops up in each one, over a very long period of time like 6 months. Maybe let's get a thread for this idea going somewhere new.

It may reduce the number of "what's the biggest strain that will be the most potent" threads that pop up.

 

[dingo]

@Savoy
If we build a catalogue of strain history, this may be more reliable then the hype from some seed resellers.

Also we should include:
Light source
Soil type or hydro

This will give a more balanced indication of a strain performance. People with 1000w lights and hydro will get the best the strain can offer, where a small pot and a 100w light in a small box will give far less yield(therefore easier to establish which strains can realistically produce based on environment provided).

 

[Muddy]

All that information is already contained in the smoke reports, so putting it into another thread would be redundant. I was thinking more along the lines of a thread that contains links to all the smoke reports, broken down by various categories.

Besides Mod support for this to become an informative resource, we need to discuss and agree the mandatory fields in each strain posted.
eg:
Name
Breeder
Reviews
Sativa or Indica or Ruderalis %
Effect
Odour while growing
Odour when dry
Taste
Difficulty level
Prefers PH x.x
Seed to Harvest in days
Grows well around which latitudes
etc.
Height

 

[cres]

Super auto = very light sensitive, with some auto flowering . We have seen time and time again growers with super autos indoors that don't finish without reducing light hours.

 

[maffro]

Im looking for a "superduper Auto" !
Not really just a super one will do, ive bookmarked a few like superstinky/supercalihaze but my grow conditions arnt as bad as Scandinavia but they are bad, maybe good during June - August and i may be able to fit in 3 weeks of growbox at the start.
Do the autos that are derived from Hazes have a different growth pattern to the indica dominant ones ?
Do they require higher night time temps for optimum growth ?
Or do they need bigger pots or a certain type of soil ?

 

[RAMBLNMAN]

You sir,are hilarious!!!...and whats the diff between a "super auto" and reg auto??I have some of those Super Stinky,are they that stinky???