
Wow, no kidding?!
@stan_mephisto are you guys working on the equivalent to Sweet's F1FV's, and other's so called Fast Versions? I can attest to keen interest in that by many folks I know! In particular, outdoor growers... The primary caveats being: mold resistance; actual speed in bloom; how readily they trigger into blooming... My experience with them from both commercial and private breeders runs the gamut, which includes F1's with the rare fully auto'ing expression, and/or hair trigger blooming.
I run FV's every year! And as you know, more and more are getting into this game.

Funny, I still have some old photo crosses Mephisto made way back, offered up by Mitch and Daz. Fem's made from plants so nice they just had to knock them up! One, my fav' is SourBubble/ChemD x Alien OG. This girl produces fantastic buds that have distinct rose-floral aromas dominating, like nothing I have had before... Mitch and Daz know about her, I've tried waving her at them a few times now as a worthy candidate to pursue....
Whatever the mechanism is behind "auto'ing", there is definitely more than one modality of action behind it, and it sure a hell isn't a simple double recessive allele gig either, seen far to many "F1" results to counter that argument despite what some breeders, even Sweet, have to say about it...
In fact this year I ran a custom cross of Early Bluebonic x S99v4 (auto) that behaved like an auto in all manners; sexed and triggered bloom outside, in July, done in 10 weeks total.... I've also had a Maine's Own Blueberry/OGKush x Cindy99 auto do the same thing...
I'd love to hear Mitch and Tim's take on this -

Of particular interest is if there is significant difference between auto x photo results, and photo x auto results?
At your convenience, maybe pass this on to the Bosses please, as I despise Reddit/IG/FB... AFN is where the info needs be at anyway, a lot of interested and curious eyes here!
