Grey Bear
Confidential Cultivator
For hydro the absolute simplest with the least moving parts or stuff to deal with is an airstone in a five gallon bucket.
I don't think it gets much more basic than that
You have a bucket with a lid
a netpot to put into the lid of the bucket
hydroton to put in the net pot
Airstone in the bucket
Air pump to drive air stone
Airhose to connect airstone and air pump.
Nutrients.
It is very manageable.
One difference between rdwc and dwc that is often overlooked is scale.
The nutrients behave differently in larger volumes and when you begin to factor in flow rates thinks can really get wild.
This is why you see a move in rdwc towards larger bulkhead connectors.
I think serious hydroponic growers that need the scale of rdwc will eventually do away with separate rez and opt for a common trough style rez approx. 18"- 24" wide x 18" x 24" tall x ??' long, using a combination of airstones and waterpumps to keep the nutrient solution mixed and oxygenated. This would be with or without a separate rez for mixing/chilling/etc.
Many nutrients do fine in 25l -100l applications but not so well in larger applications. Or not in larger applications with irregular flow rates in the system.
Don't get me wrong, I think RDWC is a great system, but like any of the systems there pro's & cons to each.
One of the biggest factors believe it or not, will be do you like the system?
If you don't, I don't care how much you paid for it, it will never pay for itself.
But, if you love that little bucket with its little air pump beating itself up for you, you would be amazed at the results.
Point is you got a like the system, understand it, and use it correctly for it to work.
Good luck in the decision!
GB
I don't think it gets much more basic than that
You have a bucket with a lid
a netpot to put into the lid of the bucket
hydroton to put in the net pot
Airstone in the bucket
Air pump to drive air stone
Airhose to connect airstone and air pump.
Nutrients.
It is very manageable.
One difference between rdwc and dwc that is often overlooked is scale.
The nutrients behave differently in larger volumes and when you begin to factor in flow rates thinks can really get wild.
This is why you see a move in rdwc towards larger bulkhead connectors.
I think serious hydroponic growers that need the scale of rdwc will eventually do away with separate rez and opt for a common trough style rez approx. 18"- 24" wide x 18" x 24" tall x ??' long, using a combination of airstones and waterpumps to keep the nutrient solution mixed and oxygenated. This would be with or without a separate rez for mixing/chilling/etc.
Many nutrients do fine in 25l -100l applications but not so well in larger applications. Or not in larger applications with irregular flow rates in the system.
Don't get me wrong, I think RDWC is a great system, but like any of the systems there pro's & cons to each.
One of the biggest factors believe it or not, will be do you like the system?
If you don't, I don't care how much you paid for it, it will never pay for itself.
But, if you love that little bucket with its little air pump beating itself up for you, you would be amazed at the results.
Point is you got a like the system, understand it, and use it correctly for it to work.
Good luck in the decision!
GB