Lighting 2 Blue AutoMazar single res, using dutch Pro Auto nutrients

[TaNg]

Great pics bro and I can see some ambers in the last so I would start my 10-14 day flush now but it's entirely up to you,there is plenty of fuel left in the leaves for her to go at least two weeks on plain water and you will have some beautifully clean weed.

 

[Abbmacher]

Great pics bro and I can see some ambers in the last so I would start my 10-14 day flush now but it's entirely up to you,there is plenty of fuel left in the leaves for her to go at least two weeks on plain water and you will have some beautifully clean weed.

I think your right there TaNg, I am do my res changes at the weekend, so, will start her on h2O.

 

[Abbmacher]

Great pics bro and I can see some ambers in the last so I would start my 10-14 day flush now but it's entirely up to you,there is plenty of fuel left in the leaves for her to go at least two weeks on plain water and you will have some beautifully clean weed.

I think your right there TaNg, I am do my res changes at the weekend, so, will start her on h2O.

 

[Abbmacher]

Deffo flush time, 1 week or 2?????

 

[Abbmacher]

A few pictures of the plant going into flush.
Ph of water is 6.1, I do wonder if the water needs to be ph specific due to the fact the point of a flush is to only uptake the water. I thought PH setting was to provide maximum nutrient uptake

 

[TaNg]

View attachment 346946View attachment 346947View attachment 346948View attachment 346949View attachment 346950View attachment 346951View attachment 346952

A few pictures of the plant going into flush.
Ph of water is 6.1, I do wonder if the water needs to be ph specific due to the fact the point of a flush is to only uptake the water. I thought PH setting was to provide maximum nutrient uptake

No point in PH adjusting in flush bro even in hydro.

 

[Abbmacher]

some Blue Mazar bud candy before the chop!



- - - Updated - - -

Bearing in mind this is one plant. Notice pictures 2 and 3 still seem to be foxtailing. The only difference is that that side is under the older GN006 with 1 less white led in each cluster.
Also the buds on the right under the newer version seem to be denser and further along with amber trichs!
Hmmm Strange!!

- - - Updated - - -

Bearing in mind this is one plant. Notice pictures 2 and 3 still seem to be foxtailing. The only difference is that that side is under the older GN006 with 1 less white led in each cluster.
Also the buds on the right under the newer version seem to be denser and further along with amber trichs!
Hmmm Strange!!

 

[TaNg]

View attachment 348153View attachment 348154View attachment 348155View attachment 348150View attachment 348151View attachment 348152

- - - Updated - - -

Bearing in mind this is one plant. Notice pictures 2 and 3 still seem to be foxtailing. The only difference is that that side is under the older GN006 with 1 less white led in each cluster.
Also the buds on the right under the newer version seem to be denser and further along with amber trichs!
Hmmm Strange!!

- - - Updated - - -

Bearing in mind this is one plant. Notice pictures 2 and 3 still seem to be foxtailing. The only difference is that that side is under the older GN006 with 1 less white led in each cluster.
Also the buds on the right under the newer version seem to be denser and further along with amber trichs!
Hmmm Strange!!

beautiful buds shots bro and great observation about the new spectrum,I've been thinking its increased speed too.