• We are officially moved over to Discourse.
    Autoflower Discourse"
    You will have to create a new login for the new site!
    This current Xenforo-based forum will be preserved as a read-only archive going forward with efforts to better categorize and tag original and canonical content.
    The URL autoflower.org will soon point to the new Discourse site; so we'll be back to business in a few days!
    Send Son of Hobbes a private message if you have any questions!

Live Stoner Chat Autoflowering vs Photosensitive Data Collection

Magic

Canna Engineer
Joined
Sep 11, 2013
Messages
4,411
Reputation
10
Reaction score
8,698
Points
0
Age
39
:Sharing One:Wanted to start a thread where fellow members with experience with autos and photos can compare and contrast the differences and similarities between the two. i see a lot of people ask about autos and do they compare to photos and from what i read there are auto strains that are far better than some photo strains. i can read site after site of people i dont know talking about what they think, but i didnt much like that idea so i decided to ask my family of trusted growers at afn what they had to say about the matter. here is a quick template of some questions id like you guys to answer for me and anyone that would want to know feel free to add any additional information.

Auto vs Photos
How do they compare in:
Yield?

Potency?

which is easier to grow?

which do you prefer growing/smoking?

Name some autos strains that are better than some photos?

Name some photo strains that no auto is even close to comparing to (yet):grin:

Pros and Cons
Photo Pros:
Photo Cons:

Auto Pros:
Auto Cons:

In ten years which will you say will be growers choice?
(will photos continue to get better and keep a gap between the two or will autos close the gap and more growers will migrate toward autos because of a faster production):peace:
 
Back
Top