Ive run a 600W bulb dimmed at the '400W' setting but was told it supposedly alters the wavelengths of light emitted from the lamp. So its best to keep the bulb wattage to the setting on the ballast to get the correct light etc...
I believe it would be 400W plus the energy lost in the ballast...so say its a 90% efficient ballast, if it outputs 400W to the lamp, the ballast will be drawing 444W.
(400W / 90%) x 100 = 444.4W
I would myself going on advice given to me by friends who have grown for a far sight longer than me, and the cost of bulbs wasnt an issue with me as I needed a 250W and 400W lamp etc to deal with the summer heat...
I used to run dual 600 and dim them down. If you think about it, you dim in an emergency so get the bulb set for your max wattage. I doubt I'll ever be a good enough grower to notice a "wavelength" difference.
I used to run dual 600 and dim them down. If you think about it, you dim in an emergency so get the bulb set for your max wattage. I doubt I'll ever be a good enough grower to notice a "wavelength" difference.
I don't think the magnetic ballast uses that much electricity. I think you're correct about 50 watts you might use 300 watts MaxI have 250W HPS bulb and 250W ballast. Not digital. So I am paying for 500W? I was always thinking that ballast didn't eat that much electricy, maybe max.50W. Isn't ballast just converter?