sniper
scope'n the dope
SPOT ON b0b!!! Gotta show you some love for that tid bit!!! Not many folks get that about expended energy on cannabis plants!!!.....the plant doesn't rotate in the ground outside either!!!
outside the light moves
SPOT ON b0b!!! Gotta show you some love for that tid bit!!! Not many folks get that about expended energy on cannabis plants!!!.....the plant doesn't rotate in the ground outside either!!!
outside the light moves
Hi all I recently harvested 3 AKR. The 1st akr I pulled at 11 weeks gave it 1 flush, and when that eas dry and curing it was really dank and had an awesome taste.. I pulled the next 2 at 12 weeks and gave 2 flushes and like 45 hrs of dark. Dried it and is currently in curing process but I did try it and there is no dank smell and not as great taste..
Can anyone explain where the dank ass smell comes from and how I can obtain it..
inside it shouldnt have too , unless your cheap and not providing enough , but the same applies , DO NOT TURN YOUR PLANTS , REASON BEING WHAT I POSTED ABOVE , I DONT CARE WHO YOU ARE , IF YOU ARGUE THE POINT YOU ARE WRONG !
nuff said
edit, outdoors it moves , but the plant is still hit from every angle , arguing indoors vs outdoors is like arguing day and night !
however , when you turn your plant it then uses the energy to turn leaves and even branches towards the brightest light source , when you turn it the next day it wastes that energy doing that all over again
I was thinking more about a less-uniform UVB light source (to enhance tric development) and that it would be beneficial to expose the entire plant.
I never thought about the effect of rotating the plant. If I had thought about it, it would have seemed equally intuitive that "uniform exposure" is better. But, what you say makes a great deal of sense. Thanks for pointing it out to me.
Back to UVB: Would it make sense to move the (clip-on) CFL every day to expose different sides of a plant? Would that relatively small and supplemental light moving around cause the problem you mentioned?
I'm just starting to experiment with UVB. (The reason I mentioned it here: I was thinking more resinous buds could affect dankness. Trying to stay on-topic with the OP's question.).
I know the light outside moves, but in a tent or closet, the plant doesn't need to move because of reflection. Hence, the plant still gets light from all angles and sides and can use ALL its energy for growth and flower. If one wants to turn their plants, then if it makes you feel good, do it. Lets all take a 2 plant challenge on our next grow. 1 plant turned a 1/2 turn daily and 1 not and compile the results.
i use reptile uvb enhanced lights and from my results i can say they worked for me in adding to the trichome development
if turning a plant indoors gives someone better results they need to seriously think about bettering their environment
At the risk of hijacking the OP's topic:
1. Do you use multiple CFLs (or a T8 or T5 tube) for more uniform exposure? Or, does it not matter?
2. When do you start using it?
3. How long do you expose the plant each day, and what distance do you use?
I can see how turning might give better results, but I also see your point. My first auto grow was under t5s. In flower I added 2 warm CFLs (front left and rear left sides of plant). I think rotating was the "lessor of two evils." But, it would have been better to add 2 more CFLs for even coverage than to rate the plant.
Definitely good info. I would have never thought about the plant expending energy to follow the light. I can see how that rotation could have caused the sides to orient toward the side lighting, then orient to the top lighting when the side disappeared.
My only skepticism is that a lot of knowledgeable people use "light movers" for more even coverage. Maybe that's different? Not as drastic as rotating the light? Maybe the direct correlation to rotating would be just rotating the plant 10 degrees (back and forth) to cast shadows slightly differently, not a half- (or full-) rotation?