- Joined
- Apr 25, 2014
- Messages
- 11,778
- Reputation
- 1,409
- Reaction score
- 44,509
- Points
- 0
- Currently Smoking
- ALL AUTOS BABY and some photos
I use botanicare hercules pots that are made for air pruning they look nothing like a airpot I also use airpots too. I know what you say about there design making the roots seek air but the hercules is a completely different design but works just as good at making and filling the container with roots IF 912 does not grow a swirl for a root ball then the pot works if he just gets the typical go around the pot type root structure then it does not work. I still think getting air into the side of the bucket will change the whole dynamics of the ball IMO. Here is a pic of the hercules just to show that it looks nothing like a airpot but works just as good I know I have compared root ballsTo me it looks like a regular bucket aerated with some holes, nothing looking or functioning like a real Air-Pot®. The purpose of airpots is to guide the roots to air exposure, with inward-curving surfaces (the most important part) focusing/directing roots to the adjacent outer protruding holes. But you're bucket surface area is like 90+% flat, doing nothing to direct roots to the holes. If simple outward-protruding holes worked like an Air-pot, we'd all know that and be using them rather than paying for expensive real Air-pots.
What you might do, to get the functionality of an Air-Pot, is have holes like you have alternating with an inward protrusion you probably form by heating up the plastic and pushing it inward while hot and pliable. Just take a look at a real airpot.
Otherwise, Air-pots work well, are very cost-effective (cheap in context of many other growing expenses) and would likely more than pay for themselves the first time used.
Attachments
Last edited: