Flushing vs. Flushing

I get about 525 ppm in RO using 1 level Tbsp
Maybe ive lost my mind but i have the new formula. Ima take some pics.
But you tried the feed calculator? Just switch to g and ppm you'll see their measurements
 
I get about 525 ppm in RO using 1 level Tbsp
1tsp
RO+ mine has mineral filter so low 30s ppm.
1.7ec
~800ppm
6.4g
Off by 0.05g
So who is closer to their feeding calculator?
 

Attachments

  • 20200322_140950.jpg
    20200322_140950.jpg
    215 KB · Views: 131
  • 20200322_140917.jpg
    20200322_140917.jpg
    291.9 KB · Views: 129
  • 20200322_140858.jpg
    20200322_140858.jpg
    220.1 KB · Views: 135
  • 20200322_140628.jpg
    20200322_140628.jpg
    418.9 KB · Views: 130
  • 20200322_140509.jpg
    20200322_140509.jpg
    372 KB · Views: 128
  • 20200322_140217.jpg
    20200322_140217.jpg
    630.1 KB · Views: 131
  • 20200322_140133.jpg
    20200322_140133.jpg
    307.9 KB · Views: 129
  • 20200322_140020.jpg
    20200322_140020.jpg
    231.1 KB · Views: 132
  • 20200322_135736.jpg
    20200322_135736.jpg
    332.9 KB · Views: 124
Bag says 6.4g 1.7ec so my meter should be ok.
Fyi i had a fresh bag and i shook it well.
You may have the old formula but still way off to me.
 
Oh crap are you doing it per 5/gallon? My bad
 
I'm using the 2.0 megacrop. also there are (3?) ppm scales I believe my HM TDS-3 uses the 700 scales s0 it will depend which scale you're comparing to. When I make a batch again I'll take pics also

1tsp
RO+ mine has mineral filter so low 30s ppm.
1.7ec
~800ppm
6.4g
Off by 0.05g
So who is closer to their feeding calculator?
 
Food for thought on flushing commercially; we've had talks at our grow speculating about what it does and doesn't do, but the fact of the matter (that we all agreed on unanimously) is that it does save you around a week (or two) of feeding, which in our case of spending about $1,000 a week on nutrients, is a pretty big deal lol. Plants aren't getting any healthier or robust from feeding up to chop IMO.
 
I dont flush however I stop using MC and use Sweet Candy only for last 5 days
 
Food for thought on flushing commercially; we've had talks at our grow speculating about what it does and doesn't do, but the fact of the matter (that we all agreed on unanimously) is that it does save you around a week (or two) of feeding, which in our case of spending about $1,000 a week on nutrients, is a pretty big deal lol. Plants aren't getting any healthier or robust from feeding up to chop IMO.
You must have millions in rev. 1k aint much if it gives you results.
40k gallons at 6g/gal 2400lb mc at $4500
Screenshot_20200322-183225_Calculator.jpg
 
Last edited:
Commercial growers from my understanding grow on a schedule, plants are harvest at a set number of days. Home growers and small op growers tend to let their plants run longer. As far as the money saving aspect, I'll say it again, most growers, commercial included overfeed their plants under the misguided idea that plants can be force fed. You'd save more by cutting back the EC/PPM level by 10% across the board. And unless you've actually tested your theory, it remains that, a theory. If you have tested, I'd like to see the data.
Although I'll agree, if you only flush for a week or less, the plants is just beginning to go into starvation. Funny though, no other agricultural operations "flush" there crops.......


Food for thought on flushing commercially; we've had talks at our grow speculating about what it does and doesn't do, but the fact of the matter (that we all agreed on unanimously) is that it does save you around a week (or two) of feeding, which in our case of spending about $1,000 a week on nutrients, is a pretty big deal lol. Plants aren't getting any healthier or robust from feeding up to chop IMO.
 
Commercial growers from my understanding grow on a schedule, plants are harvest at a set number of days. Home growers and small op growers tend to let their plants run longer. As far as the money saving aspect, I'll say it again, most growers, commercial included overfeed their plants under the misguided idea that plants can be force fed. You'd save more by cutting back the EC/PPM level by 10% across the board. And unless you've actually tested your theory, it remains that, a theory. If you have tested, I'd like to see the data.
Although I'll agree, if you only flush for a week or less, the plants is just beginning to go into starvation. Funny though, no other agricultural operations "flush" there crops.......

That's a bit of a myth (on schedule,) it depends on when the plants are done. If we're in a crunch or need product, we'll harvest early, otherwise we're scoping trichs at this facility :cheers: As far as the feeds go, where is the data that cutting back 10% does anything like you suggested? I'm all about testing things out :thumbsup: We're pushing upwards of 1700 ppm on our flowering feeds with not even the slightest burning in tips, we're actually thinking of trying to push them even more. We do follow a schedule for nutrients, but we also give the plants what they are asking for. Shrug. It's just scaled up.

Most ag operations aren't smoking their product either.
 
Back
Top