Hi,
I recently had a discussion on a different forum where someone asked which LED lights are good and I said that I advice the Mars Hydro website since I bought them recently.
There was this guy who claimed to be the LED expert who basically called me ignorant for buying those lights and told me that I made a huge mistake for buying them and that I have no idea about LED basically... I do not believe this guy since I have the lights and I'm doing pretty well (except Cal/Mag issues and some dots on leafs)
I'm quoting what he wrote and would like to know if there is truth in the par data and the thing he wrote about 700 umol? Did anyone do a Par test for the Mars II?
"No they are not, Mars II suck the big one. My buddy has two that his roommate bought and they do not produce like a high quality fixture can.
If you google/youtube the Par data for it you will see that it no longer flowers cannabis (@700 umol minimum) after 12 inches. your at best going to get a 2'x2' area with penetration no more than 12" away from the fixture, and dim sides. And their inclusion of 120 degree lenses and 2.25w "5w" diodes make the thing a piece of marketing junk. Whats that--your "400" model uses how many watts--180?
So four in a 4x4 tent would cost ~800 and barely have enough light to maybe do a SOG. $800 for 1-3 year warranty (depending on vendor). They are the cheapest Chinese fixtures you can buy these days, I feel sorry for anyone who buys one and thinks that its great. Ignorance is bliss, but sometimes you just want to smack it out of someone."
I recently had a discussion on a different forum where someone asked which LED lights are good and I said that I advice the Mars Hydro website since I bought them recently.
There was this guy who claimed to be the LED expert who basically called me ignorant for buying those lights and told me that I made a huge mistake for buying them and that I have no idea about LED basically... I do not believe this guy since I have the lights and I'm doing pretty well (except Cal/Mag issues and some dots on leafs)
I'm quoting what he wrote and would like to know if there is truth in the par data and the thing he wrote about 700 umol? Did anyone do a Par test for the Mars II?
"No they are not, Mars II suck the big one. My buddy has two that his roommate bought and they do not produce like a high quality fixture can.
If you google/youtube the Par data for it you will see that it no longer flowers cannabis (@700 umol minimum) after 12 inches. your at best going to get a 2'x2' area with penetration no more than 12" away from the fixture, and dim sides. And their inclusion of 120 degree lenses and 2.25w "5w" diodes make the thing a piece of marketing junk. Whats that--your "400" model uses how many watts--180?
So four in a 4x4 tent would cost ~800 and barely have enough light to maybe do a SOG. $800 for 1-3 year warranty (depending on vendor). They are the cheapest Chinese fixtures you can buy these days, I feel sorry for anyone who buys one and thinks that its great. Ignorance is bliss, but sometimes you just want to smack it out of someone."