Live Stoner Chat Live Stoner Chat - Jan-Mar '24

[Dab]

 

[420Forever]

What is it that a photo can do that an Autoflower can’t?

get bigger

Let’s solve that and the other way around and it won’t be a question of which one is the best, just what suits the grower the best.

ah, a much better way of putting it....and yes, plain & simple, photoz suit me the best ppp

 

[Frankthetank]

Someone’s got to be on the side of the plant that the fuckin’ website is named for…

 

[hecno]

@Heart of flowers Choice that is not available in Autos , There are many great Photo strains that you don't see in Autos .

 

[Heart of flowers]

If done right, autos. Given the same space and plant count….. over the course of a year I’ll get a greater yield from autos, over photos.

Thank you @Frankthetank

 

[Cannaficionado]

Someone’s got to be on the side of the plant that the fuckin’ website is named for…
View attachment 1664163

no ones against autos though. After all id say a good 85-90% of the pics shared here on stoner chat are autos.

 

[Mañ'O'Green]

I like autos better for indoors, I can keep them smaller than photos. Even with 7'8" tall space photos need a lot of super cropping.

 

[Atulip]

In my experience, autos beat out photos in yield/time. I've noticed no difference for potency. I like the ability to single tent perpetual as well.

Benefits for photos would be cloning(cost savings, known phenos, better for bulk?), maybe filling a larger space with lower plant count; I haven't grown outdoors so maybe those photo monsters have a better yield/time also?

 

[Frankthetank]

no ones against autos though. After all id say a good 85-90% of the pics shared here on stoner chat are autos.

 

[Frankthetank]

I've noticed no difference for potency. I

I second this..